On September 29, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an interim final rule titled “Expansion of End-User Controls to Cover Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities.” Known as the Affiliates Rule, the measure significantly broadened the reach of U.S. export controls by extending restrictions to foreign affiliates 50 percent or more owned, directly or indirectly, by one or more entities on BIS or OFAC restricted lists. This alignment with OFAC’s “50 Percent Rule” closed a longstanding gap that had allowed listed entities to access U.S. goods and technology through technically separate affiliates.
The rule applies to foreign (non-U.S.) affiliates of entities on the Entity List, Military End-User (MEU) List, and certain Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs)* under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). It introduced three key compliance concepts: (1) a “most restrictive owner” standard, requiring affiliates to follow the toughest licensing condition applicable to any listed owner; (2) a new Red Flag 29, obligating exporters to investigate ownership when they suspect listed-party control; and (3) a strict liability approach, meaning exporters may be liable even without knowledge of the ownership chain. To ease transition, BIS issued a Temporary General License (TGL) permitting limited activity with affiliates in allied countries until December 1, 2025.
However, on November 1, 2025, the White House announced a one-year suspension of the rule’s implementation, effective November 10, 2025, as part of a diplomatic arrangement with China. The pause applies globally, not only to Chinese affiliates, and will be formalized by BIS through additional rulemaking. While this suspension halts enforcement, it does not reverse the rule’s adoption or its eventual activation.
The term “certain Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs)” refers to a specific subset of entities designated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) that are cross-referenced within the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)—particularly in § 744.8(a)(1) – connected to proliferation, military end use, or technology-transfer risks and tied to Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea.
Practical Considerations
For global exporters and multinational companies, the suspension period should be used proactively. Firms are advised to develop ownership-screening capabilities, refine supplier and customer due diligence, update export-control manuals and contract clauses, and train internal teams on identifying and escalating affiliate-ownership risks. The new compliance environment requires going beyond traditional list-based screening to analyze beneficial ownership and aggregate control across entire corporate networks.
When the Affiliates Rule ultimately takes effect- likely in late 2026 – it will represent a structural shift in export-control compliance. Companies will need to treat many non-listed but majority-owned foreign affiliates as fully restricted entities. The one-year deferral therefore offers not a reprieve, but a critical preparation window to strengthen compliance systems, ownership data transparency, and cross-functional coordination between Legal, Compliance, and Supply Chain functions.
Related News
US sanctions and China’s Blocking Order
EU 20th package of sanctions against Russia